This week, we’ll take a look at two key moments from the Tottenham v Newcastle game. We’ll discuss Callum Wilson’s challenge on Harry Kane, and the penalty awarded to the opposition. We’ll also look at the second phase of the IFAB’s testing on VAR.
Newcastle’s goal against Tottenham
The Newcastle striker believes his goal against Tottenham should have stood. The goal came from a cross by Fabian Schar, which Wilson ran onto and lobbed over Hugo Lloris. Despite colliding with Lloris, Wilson continued, spinning and lifting the ball over the defender’s head. A VAR check found no foul.
The goal was not disallowed, although there was a clear infringement of the rules of the game. Tottenham goalkeeper Hugo Lloris was in the wrong position to challenge the goal. Lloris rushed out of his area to intercept the ball, but it was not a handball or an offside.
Read More : مباريات اليوم مباشر
Callum Wilson’s challenge on Harry Kane
A challenge by Callum Wilson on Harry Kane should have stood at Spur – the decision to call it off is a controversial one. Many fans believed that Wilson should have been sent off and that the tackle should have stood. However, a BBC Sport report suggests that this may not be the case. It should be noted that the match was played in a different manner than usual. In addition, the referee did not have the time to make the decision to call off the game.
The incident took place outside of the penalty area and the VAR decision was correct. The challenge was deemed a foul and a simple coming together. Although Wilson’s goal was controversial, Alan Shearer praised the striker for his contribution to the team. Tottenham manager Jamie Redknapp, however, disagreed with the decision and called for the goal to stand.
Erling Haaland’s penalty
A review of Erling Haaland’s performance at Spurs will show that the Danish midfielder should have scored on his first touch of the game. But the decision to give it to Haaland is a matter of judgment. This is a tough decision as he should have scored on his first touch of the match. But there are plenty of factors to consider.
Info : بث مباشر مباريات اليوم
For a start, Haaland is huge. He is only slightly smaller than most elite soccer players, and stands nearly a head higher than most fullbacks and wingers. His size also makes him an aerial threat, able to clear the ball over midfielders and other midfielders. On the other hand, his teammate, Darwin Nunez, has a similar profile. He drifts wide in order to find space, accelerates quickly and moves smartly.
IFAB’s second phase of testing for VAR
The IFAB has decided to scrap talks about allowing fans to hear the discussions between the referee and VAR. That would mean changing the laws of the game. While this would make the process more transparent, it would also mean that fans would not be able to hear the conversations leading up to the final decision. However, it has listened to the concerns of supporters and will keep working to improve the process.
VAR is already being used in 13 competitive matches in England, with six decisions being overturned in the FA Cup. So far, it has proved to be an effective tool, with the amount of time taken to decide on a decision significantly decreased. Moreover, it has reduced refereeing errors, IFAB reports.
Laws of the game
A recent incident involving the Laws of the Game and a Tottenham Hotspur goal caused some controversy. A former referee, Dermot Gallagher, reacted to the goal, which was controversially awarded after Hugo Lloris collided with Callum Wilson, who stayed on his feet and lobbed the ball into an empty net kora star tv.
While Spurs were in control, a controversial penalty in the 96th minute denied Spurs a point. VAR’s double check confirmed that the buildup was offside, and the referee awarded a penalty to Newcastle. However, Wilson’s goal was not disallowed and Spurs held on for a deserved draw.
Refereeing technology
Refereeing technology is controversial and has been at the heart of much controversy. However, the use of such technology could improve the accuracy of goal decisions in controversial situations. As with any other technological advancement, it comes with some drawbacks. For one thing, it is incredibly expensive, especially for the poorer football associations. Another problem is that it has led to an atmosphere of distrust towards referees. Some players, managers and spectators have shown their resentment towards goal-line technology by retaliating against referees using it.
Another problem with football referees is that they are often compared to judges in the “real” world. Referees must be able to interpret situations and make decisions quickly, without disrupting the flow of the game. As such, mistakes can happen.
